Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 22, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

The appellant, a hoy of eighteen years, residing in Flemingsburg, was tried and convicted for violating section 2739g-58 of the Kentucky Statutes, which reads:

“Any person who shall unlawfully take, drive or operate a vehicle without the knowledge and consent of the owner shall be guilty of the offense of grand larceny and punished as provided by law in such cases.”

There is no dispute concerning the facts in this case.

On Sunday evening, December 7,1924, a lot of young folks of Flemingsburg had gone over to Maysville. Appellant and another boy,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Hart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Lyman v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Newsome v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Board of Trustees of P. & FRF v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  3. Cook v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  4. Carey-Reed Co. v. SiscoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API