Legal Opinion
Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Federal Crop Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2006No. 05-2321PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
This breach of contract action was brought by a group of thirteen insurance companies 1 who provide federal crop insurance, alleging that the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) breached two provisions of the 1998 Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA). The FCIC moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and the district court granted the motion on that ground, but ruled in the alternative that dismissal was also warranted because the insurers had neither exhausted their administrative remedies nor established any exception to the exhaustion requirement. The insurers…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ace Property And Casualty Insurance Company v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006