MPS Merchant Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge:
In these petitions for review, we consider whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) arbitrarily and capriciously determined that various energy companies committed tariff violations in Cali-fornia during the summer of '2000. We conclude that it did not, and we deny the petitions for review.
I
This case is part of a long-standing series of decisions arising out of California’s energy crisis in 2000 and 2001. The relevant factual background was described in our prior opinions, so we need not describe it in detail here. 1 In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- California Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Appeal of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource EnergySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Appeal of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource EnergySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- California Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017