Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 10, 1970No. 22,647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

In this case the Court’s concern is with whether the appellant was improperly denied a right of cross-examination when the convening authority and the military judge denied his request that a doctor be returned from a hospital ship in the Western Pacific to be subjected to cross-examination.

A general court-martial at the United States Naval Station, Treasure Island, San Francisco, California, tried the appellant for desertion and for disobedience of a superior officer. He pleaded not guilty. The court found him not guilty of desertion but guilty of the lesser…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. HarveyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HeilmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. WalkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API