Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Dunbar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The respondent, the plaintiff in the court below, being a corporation engaged in diverting and supplying water for irrigation, entered into a contract with one Roeding, who was then the owner of a certain tract of land, by which the respondent sold to said Roeding, for the sum of twelve hundred dollars, a water right for said real estate, and in and by said contract “ grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to the party of the second part, from the main canal of the'party of the first part, or from a branch thereof, all the water that may be required, not exceeding at any time four cubic feet…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cole v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bloch v. IshamIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Brown v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Coulter v. Sausalito Bay Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Dexter v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Miller & Lux, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.