Legal Opinion
Routh v. Routh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1959No. 37,777PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The facts are not seriously in dispute. Plaintiff, Glen L. Routh, 44 years of age, and defendant, Ray Routh, 41 years of age, are brothers. Each is engaged in operating a rented farm located near New Rich-land, Minnesota. The farms are about a mile apart. For a number of years it has been the practice of plaintiff and defendant to exchange work, each helping the other, especially during the cornpicking, haying, and harvesting seasons.
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Smock v. Mankato Elks ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Bruckman v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- LaFavor v. American National Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Raymond v. BaehrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961