Legal Opinion

Kroksather v. Western Union Life Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff and from an order overruling a motion for judgment non ob-stante or for a new trial in an action upon a policy of life insurance. By a policy, dated April 24, 1918, tbe defendant insured tbe life of Lars Kroksather for three thousand dollars ($3,000), tbe beneficiary being Anna Kroksather, bis wife, tbe plaintiff in tbis action. The annual premium of $62.88 was payable on tbe 24th of April each year, *620and the policy contained tbe usual provision allowing tbirty-one days of grace without interest. The insured paid two premiums, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. . the Union Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Pitt v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Banholzer v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Kerns v. New Jersey Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Clover v. Bankers Life Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Rott v. Provident Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Illinois Bankers Life Assur. Co. v. CutlipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API