Legal Opinion

Steiner, Inc. v. HILL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1951Published

1Opinion

Petition for Rehearing

WARNER, J.

The defendants have petitioned for a rehearing. Their prime objection to our previous opinion is found in their challenge to our holding that the claimed waiver of the standard for the hops was not supported by a consideration. They now urge that we were in error for failing to hold that the waiver was one of election between two inconsistent rights, which, as they contend, needs no consideration.

For convenience, we shall hereinafter refer to.the defendant respondents as “the growers” and to the plaintiff appellant as “the buyer.”

In our former opinion we held…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Mitchell v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Johnson v. FeskensOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. First National Bank v. StretcherOregon Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API