Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of its claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Because the dismissal was based on the erroneous conclusion that a party may not maintain both a claim for breach of contract and a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on the same conduct, and because appellant stated a claim upon which relief may be granted, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondents Columbia Casualty Company and Continental Insurance Company commenced a declaratory-judgment action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sleepy's LLC v. Select Comfort Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Barger v. BlueSky TelePsych, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Lunde v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Riley J. Wilson v. Career Education CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Riley J. Wilson v. Career Education CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.