Legal Opinion
Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 18, 2022No. 1:17-cv-00944Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM MDL No. 2775 HIP RESURFACING Master Docket No. 1:17-md-2775 (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Paula and Jace Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00944 MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is a motion for new trial in the BHR track case of Paula and Jace Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00944. (ECF 751) The Redicks move for a new trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a)(1)(A). The motion has been fully briefed, and oral…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Keith W. Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Gary McKnight Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.