Legal Opinion
Barrios-Lomeli v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1997No. 27484PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On March 21, 1995, Adrian Obeso-Hernandez (“Hernandez”) was arrested for the sale of a controlled substance. He subsequently agreed to cooperate with the Tri-Net Narcotics Task Force (“Tri-Net”)1 and provide “substantial assistance” in *954arresting other narcotic traffickers. In exchange for his cooperation, Hernandez would receive favorable consideration at his sentencing hearing.
On March 23, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., Hernandez telephoned appellant Ruben Barrios-Lomeli (“Lomeli”) at his home in Stockton, California. Hernandez requested that Lomeli deliver four ounces of methamphetamine to him…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LloydNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Camacho v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HarnischNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. McKellipsNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Hughes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.