Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barrett v. Jones, Funderburg, Sessums, Peterson & Lee, LLC

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2009No. 2008-IA-00421-SCT, 2008-IA-00788-SCTPublished

1DissentCarlson, Presiding Justice

¶46. I agree with the majority inasmuch as “the trial court possessed the discretion to sanction SKG, but only upon a finding that Richard Scruggs’s misconduct was within the ordinary course of business of SKG.” (Maj. Op. at ¶33). However, as to issue two, concerning whether Scruggs was acting in the ordinary course of business, I must disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Scruggs was not acting in furtherance of SKG.

¶ 47. Vicarious liability falls under the auspices of Section 79-13-305(a), which states:

A partnership is liable for loss or injury caused to a person, or for a penalty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duggins v. Guardianship of WashingtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Estate of Klaus v. VICKSBURG HEALTHCAREMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Idom v. Weeks & RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Mississippi State University v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Williams v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API