Graves v. Wimpy
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Associate Justice.
The appellant and appellee are rice farmers and adjoining landowners. The appellant constructed a dam across a drainage ditch which was serving both appellant and appellee. Appellant claims this was necessary to prevent indigo-laden waters from flowing into this drainage ditch and damaging his rice crops. This dam diverted the flow of water upon appellee’s lands. Appellee cut the dam thus permitting the flow of water to again enter the jointly used drainage ditch. Appellant brought this action to require appellee to restore the breached dam; to enjoin him from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wynn v. GarlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
- Sanders v. FlennikenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Boone v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Vesper v. WoolseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Hill v. BarnardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clay v. DoddSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Holbrook v. AppleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971