Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Dorizas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1929No. 1789PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We gather from the statement of the nature and result of the suit in counsel's brief that this suit originated in a justice court, where appellant sued appellees to recover on a series of seven notes executed by Dorizas, amounting to $130, together with interest and attorney's fees. Judgment was had in the county court on appeal against defendant Dorizas for $143, and his codefendant, J. C. McCane, was discharged with his costs. This appeal is from that judgment.

The record contains no transcript of the proceedings in the justice court. There is nothing to show that the cause was ever filed in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patrick v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. American Soda Fountain Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Perry v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hamilton v. HannusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Texas Glass & Paint Co. v. Darnell Lumber Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Indemnity Insurance Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Texas Indemnity Insurance Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API