Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 11, 1953No. C. D. 1498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

In C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1381, we held that certain importations of ingots composed of aluminum, silicon, and iron as the principal component elements should properly be classified as ferrosilicon aluminum of the kind made dutiable at the rate of 2K cents per pound in paragraph 302 (j) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 302 (j)), as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Switzerland, 69 Treas. Dec. 74, T. D. 48093.

In the case now before us, it is not disputed that the merchandise is substantially like…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API