Tower v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
Importations of ingots in chief value of aluminum form the- subject of this controversy. The collector of customs classified the merchandise as aluminum silicon and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 5 cents per pound pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 302 (j) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 302 (j)).
Plaintiff contends that the commodity is an aluminum alloy and is properly dutiable at the rate of 2 cents per pound, as provided in paragraph 374 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 374), as modified *2by the General Agreement on Tariffs and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956