Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 18, 1951No. C. D. 1381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Importations of ingots in chief value of aluminum form the- subject of this controversy. The collector of customs classified the merchandise as aluminum silicon and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 5 cents per pound pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 302 (j) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 302 (j)).

Plaintiff contends that the commodity is an aluminum alloy and is properly dutiable at the rate of 2 cents per pound, as provided in paragraph 374 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 374), as modified *2by the General Agreement on Tariffs and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API