Legal Opinion
Muir v. COUNCIL 2 WASH. STATE COUNCIL
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 4, 2010No. 62380-0-IPublished
1Opinion of the Court
225 P.3d 1024 (2009)
Doyle MUIR, Respondent,
v.
COUNCIL 2 WASHINGTON STATE COUNCIL OF COUNTY & CITY EMPLOYEES and Local 1849, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Appellant.
No. 62380-0-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 21, 2009.
Publication Ordered February 4, 2010.
Richard J. Hughes, Attorney at Law, Mount Vernon, WA, for Respondent.
Jon Howard Rosen, The Rosen Law Firm, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
ELLINGTON, J.
¶ 1 Doyle Muir sued his union alleging breach of the duty of fair representation. Although the undisputed evidence established that the union's decision not to take his wage grievance to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- George Castelli v. Douglas Aircraft Company International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers District Lodge 720Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Anderson v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- John A. Peters v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.