Legal Opinion

United States v. Herbert McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1988No. 87-1070PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Herbert McDaniel appeals, pro se and in forma pauperis, the District Court’s 1 denial of his motion, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim. P. 35(a), to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm.

On March 12, 1985, a jury convicted McDaniel for knowingly and intentionally distributing heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1982) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982). On April 5, 1985, McDaniel, a first-time offender, was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, a $75,000.00 fine, and a $50.00 special assessment. Additionally, a five-year special parole term was imposed. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. William E. Wood, A/K/A Steve BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. PhungphiphadhanaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  3. United States v. Herbert McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. John V. CapozziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Telesforo PortilloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Thomas GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
  5. United States v. BarkleyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API