Legal Opinion

United States v. Barkley

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1990No. C-CR-86-101-05PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion, filed January 2, 1990, to Correct an Illegal Sentence Pursuant to Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Presently, there are two Rule 35s applicable to reduction of sentences. The current Rule 35 applies to offenses that occurred after November 1, 1987, while the former Rule 35 applies to those offenses that occurred prior to November 1, 1987. In this case, the offenses for which Defendant asserts the sentence was illegal occurred on November 17, 1986. Hence, the former Rule 35 is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Juan De Los ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Juan C. SantamariaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. PhungphiphadhanaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  5. United States v. SanchezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herrera v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
  2. United States v. Steven Hessen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Bushman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API