Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Shields

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 2011No. 11-69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.

liThis case involves the question of whether appellant, Curtis Bridges, had a curtesy interest in a settlement award involving his deceased wife, Hazel Mae Frazier. The circuit court rejected Bridges’s claim. We affirm.

The facts of this case are undisputed. Hazel Mae Frazier, who had been married three times, connects all the parties in this case. Her second husband, Elree Frazier, Sr., died on September 17, 2001, after taking a medication named Vioxx. Mr. Frazier had no known relatives or descendants, except for Ms. Frazier and seven stepchildren. After Mr. Frazier’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Sykes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Burdett v. BurdettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Dunn v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Gregory v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hurt-Hoover Investments, LLC v. FulmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. City of Marion v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Delgado v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Smith v. Rebsamen Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Humphrey v. U.S. TrusteeDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API