Legal Opinion

Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Ector

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1936No. 13323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellee, Walter Ector, brought suit against appellant, Dallas Railway & Terminal Company, to recover personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by appellee’s wife, Ethel Ector, on the occasion of a collision between two street cars owned by the appellant.

The case was tried to a jury and submitted on five special issues. The first issue required the jury to answer whether or not Ethel Ector sustained injury at the time in question. The second issue submits the question of whether or not the collision was caused by the failure of some employee of defendant to exercise a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Armour & Co. v. TomlinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. Blue Diamond Motor Bus Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EctorTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Crim v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API