Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 320. (dissenting). The majority opinion concludes that the legislature's establishment of the cap on noneconomic damages under Wis. Stat. § 655.017 (2003-04)1 and Wis. Stat. § 893.55(4)(d)2 is facially unconstitutional on equal protection grounds. Majority op., ¶ 10. The two classes the majority opinion compares are those persons subjected to medical malpractice who were awarded noneconomic damages in excess of the cap and those who were awarded noneconomic damages less than the cap. It then employs a new rational basis test, which it calls "rational basis with teeth, or meaningful rational…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.