Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Parcker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 2, 1931No. 28,370PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Aggrieved by the decision of the probate court of Hennepin county settling her final account as administratrix, Sarah E. Gensler appealed to the district court, where her appeal was dismissed. From the resulting judgment she appeals to this court. Eespondents Bercowitz are the holders of allowed claims against the estate, which we infer will absorb the Avhole residue.
The decision in the probate court was by a referee appointed pursuant to L. 1929, p. 331, c. 271. By § 5, a referee’s “rulings and decisions may be reviewed in the same manner and not otherwise as the rulings and decisions of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Paul Trust Co. v. KittsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Gorman v. Supervisors of the Town of St. MarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Stellmacher v. BruderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- In Re Estate of DevenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Riener v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Aetna Life Insurance v. CairneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934