Abu-Ghazaleh v. Chaul
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, C.J.
Mohammed Abu-Ghazaleh, IAT Group, Inc., Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc., Eduardo R. Bours, and Grupo Empresarial Agrícola Mexicano S.A. de C.V. (collectively referred to as “Abu-Ghazaleh”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for attorney’s fees and costs against appel-lees William A. Van Diepen and CSI Financial Investments Company, Inc. We reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion for attorney’s fees because we conclude that Van Diepen and CSI are liable for attorney’s fees and costs, and remand to the trial court to determine the amount.
I. Factual Background
The underlying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fong Sik Leung, as Guardian Ad Litem for Fong Gar Hong v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Visoly v. Security Pacific Credit Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Theller v. HersheyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- Lage v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Chaul v. Abu-GhazalehDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of South Florida v. BermudezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Elite Semiconductor, Inc. v. Anchor Semiconductor, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Southern Aircraft Charters, Ltd. v. Miami Executive Aviation, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026