Clarence Dawkins v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEKS, District Judge.
Clarence Dawkins has appealed from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty on three counts of an indictment charging him with violating federal narcotics laws. 1
Jurisdiction of the District Court was invoked under the provisions of 18 U.S. C. § 3231. Jurisdiction of this Court to review the appeal rests on the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294.
Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction on two grounds:
1. That the evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to support the verdict and the judgment of conviction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Joseph A. MasinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Lee Edgar Sartain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Arthur Earl Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972