Legal Opinion

Clarence Dawkins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1963No. 18654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEKS, District Judge.

Clarence Dawkins has appealed from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty on three counts of an indictment charging him with violating federal narcotics laws. 1

Jurisdiction of the District Court was invoked under the provisions of 18 U.S. C. § 3231. Jurisdiction of this Court to review the appeal rests on the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction on two grounds:

1. That the evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to support the verdict and the judgment of conviction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. Joseph A. MasinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Lee Edgar Sartain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Arthur Earl Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API