Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Darnell R. Kinnard, United States of America v. Mahlon Payne

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 13, 1972No. 24859, 24860Published

1Concurrence

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge,

concur-ing:

I concur in the reversal of Payne’s conviction and affirmance of Kinnard’s. Although I agree with much, perhaps most, of Chief Judge Bazelon’s opinion, there are important differences in approach and emphasis that lead me to state my views separately.

I

Addict informants present a serious problem of unreliability, for the reasons developed by Judge Bazelon, yet today’s crime problem requires the use of such informants, and court rules should not tamper unduly with the system, sacrificing the security of society without an advance in rights and liberties. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. David Louis Hansford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API