Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 27, 1996No. JU3267; CA A90370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Child appeals from a juvenile court order of disposition and assigns error to the portion of that order that required him to pay supervision costs as a condition of his probation. We conclude that the juvenile court exceeded its authority in imposing that condition.

Child was determined to be within the jurisdiction of the court for committing the acts that, if he were an adult, would constitute the crimes of theft in the third degree and assault in the fourth degree and was placed on probation. ORS 419C.446. Paragraph 13 of the juvenile court’s order of disposition requires child to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. RowtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. C. M. CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API