Legal Opinion

Dyno v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1999PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to compel respondent Justice of the Supreme Court, inter alia, to sign orders granting a default and preliminary injunction in an underlying nuisance action.

Petitioner commenced this original CPLR article 78 special proceeding pro se against respondent Justice of the Supreme Court (hereinafter respondent) and Mary Lou Green (now known as Mary Lou Price) (hereinafter Green/Price), seeking a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to grant petitioner’s motions and to sign proposed orders for a default…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hamptons Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Brusco v. BraunNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Paulus v. Christopher Vacirca, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Manupella v. Troy City Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Gagen v. Kipany Productions, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Onewest Bank, FSB Ex Rel. Indy-Mac Bank, FSB v. MichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Dyno v. Village of Johnson CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API