Baldeviso v. Thompson
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ABE, J.
The appellants are welfare applicants who claimed that their applications for welfare assistance were not processed within 30 days of receipt of the application as required by Federal 1 and State 2 regulations. They brought a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus before the Second Circuit Court on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Appellees (hereinafter “Department of Social Services and Housing” or “DSS&H”), charged with administering the State welfare programs, moved to quash the alternative writ of mandamus that had issued, attaching…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation v. Reed Johnston, as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Rodriguez v. SwankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Kauai Electric Division of Citizens Utilities Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Marshall v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rosa v. CWJ Contractors, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.