Legal Opinion

Portillo v. Smith Commons Dc, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 13, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-0049Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMILIANO DE JESUS PORTILLO, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 20-49 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 32 : SMITH COMMONS DC, LLC, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). Plaintiffs, four restaurant employees, seek monetary relief from their former managers for unpaid wage claims brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Minix v. CanarecciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. RW Amrine Drywall Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Salazar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Boland v. ELITE TERRAZZO FLOORING, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API