Legal Opinion

Hildebrand v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1950No. S. F. 18050Published

1Opinion of the Court

36 Cal.2d 504 (1950)

CLIFTON HILDEBRAND et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

S. F. No. 18050.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 20, 1950.

Clifton Hildebrand, in pro. per., and Sheridan Downey, Jr., for Petitioners.

Eugene D. Williams and Jerold E. Weil for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Petitioners are attorneys, Hildebrand having been admitted to practice in 1925, Bills in 1923, and McLeod in 1935. By this proceeding they seek a review of the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that they be disciplined for the violation of rule 2, section a (commonly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. Merchants Protective Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API