Legal Opinion

Howell v. Field

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Statute of Frauds. Justice Courts. Contracts. Debtor and Creditor. Before Judge Fain. Murray Superior Court. August Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

The plaintiff in this case sued the defendant in a justice’s court, on a debt which, in the original summons, was stated thus :

“1880. E. S. Howell to S. E. Field, Dr. $16.60. On promise to pay the debt of G. O. and L. 0. Terry.”

There have been three jury trials in the justice’s court of this case, and three times has it been carried by certiorari to the superior court. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff on each trial. They were set aside twice, upon the ground that the promise, if made, was void, under the statute of frauds. Upon the last trial, the testimony, in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edenfield v. CanadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Benson & Coleman v. DyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Freeman v. Carr & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Powell v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Fountain v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. VarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API