Legal Opinion
Floral Trade Council of Davis, California v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 27, 1988No. Court 87-04-00627PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This is one of several actions challenging International Trade Administration (ITA) determinations rendered as a result of a petition filed by plaintiff concerning fresh cut flowers from eight countries. This particular case involves antidumping duties with regard to miniature and standard carnations and pompon and standard chrysanthemums from Ecuador. The final determination at issue resulted in findings of weighted average dumping margins for various producers of between 2 and 19 percent. Certain Fresh Cut Flowers From Ecuador, 52 Fed.Reg. 2,128 (Jan. 20, 1987), as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Al Tech Speciality Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Connors Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Hussey Copper, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States and the United States Department of Commerce, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Floral Trade Council of Davis, Cal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.