Waldorf-Astoria Segar Co. v. Salomon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Acker, Merrall & Condit Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 28th day of February, 1905, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the FTew York Special Term, granting the plaintiff’s-motion for. an injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The action was brought to enforce a negative covenant in a lease made by the defendant Salomon to the plaintiff, and the same relief is sought against the appellant Acker, Merrall & Condit Company upon the ground that that company has accepted a lease from the defendant Salomon in violation of the covenant in the lease to the *66plaintiff with' knowledge of that covenant." Salomon is the owner of a building at the corner of Forty-second street and Fifth avenue, and 'on the--. 29th day of April, 1902, he leased, to the plaintiff a Store adjacent to the corner store on the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Standard Fashion Co. v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Siegel-Cooper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by26 opinions
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Peoples Trust Co. v. Schultz Novelty & Sporting Goods Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Won's Cards, Inc. v. Samsondale/Haverstraw Equities, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.