Legal Opinion

United States v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 20, 2004No. 03-2522, 03-2524, 03-2566PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

A federal grand jury charged defendants-appellants Dennis P. McIntosh, Janice Douglas, and Herbert H. Cates with multiple counts of mail and wire fraud. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1342, 1343. After their first trial ended in a hung jury, the appellants moved to dismiss the indictment, asserting that further prosecution would run afoul of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy bar. The district court denied this joint motion and the appellants brought these interlocutory appeals. We affirm the denial of the motions to dismiss. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Given the nature of these appeals, we trace…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. United States v. Lara-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Andujar-BascoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. CharltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API