Legal Opinion

Sherman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1976No. 50799PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for murder. A jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment.

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that his confession was voluntary and therefore it was error to admit the same into evidence. It will be seen that appellant’s contentions are correct, and the judgment must be reversed upon the authority of Farr v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 519 S.W.2d 876, and the authorities there cited.

A pre-trial hearing to determine volun-tariness was conducted in accordance with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API