Sherman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for murder. A jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment.
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that his confession was voluntary and therefore it was error to admit the same into evidence. It will be seen that appellant’s contentions are correct, and the judgment must be reversed upon the authority of Farr v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 519 S.W.2d 876, and the authorities there cited.
A pre-trial hearing to determine volun-tariness was conducted in accordance with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by40 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.