Legal Opinion

Ness v. Cowdery

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 7, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellis, J.-

The action was upon a promissory note. What the consideration for the note was is for the present immaterial. The briefs of counsel for the respective parties agree that the case was tried on the declaration and defendant’s third additional plea. . That plea was one of “set off and recoupment,” see Chapter 14823, Laws 1931, and took the form of a declaration against the plaintiff in general as-sumpsit “for money received by the plaintiff for the use of the defendant.” Archbold’s Nisi Prius 168.

At common law set-off was not allowable as a defense but after the Statute-8. Geo. 2, c.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warfield v. HepburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  2. Cullen v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Marianna Lime Products Co. v. McKaySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Hooker v. ForresterSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Marks v. National Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. Smith & Winchester Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Southern States Power Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Anderson v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Southern States Power Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API