Legal Opinion

Ostroski v. Blumauer Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1913No. 11184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Sheets, J., entered November 2, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained by the plaintiff while employed in the defendant’s logging camp. Plaintiff is of foreign birth, and testified largely through an interpreter. Defendant’s operations consisted in the falling of trees, cutting them into log lengths, and in hauling them from the woods to a point where they were loaded on cars for transportation on a logging road. The log, where felled, was beveled at one end, and around it was placed a short piece of wire rope, called a “choker,” which was hooked to a main cable. By means of a “donkey”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Walville Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Anustasakas v. International Contract Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pearson v. Alaska Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Seewald v. Harding Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Jancko v. West Coast Manufacturing & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Weidlich v. Independent Asphalt Paving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lowe v. Oak Point Piling & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API