Reilly v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice House
The city of Chicago appeals from a declaratory judgment of the circuit court of Cook County holding the city’s zoning ordinance void as it applies to plaintiff’s property.
The first question is whether plaintiff is entitled to seek judicial intervention without having sought relief at the local level. The present zoning ordinance does not provide for use variations but permits amendments. Plaintiff contends that he therefore has no administrative remedy to pursue and that under the cases he was not obligated to first seek relief through a legislative amendment. This argument appears to be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Bright v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Herman v. Village of HillsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Liebling v. Village of DeerfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cosmopolitan National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Bass v. City of JolietAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- O'CONNOR v. Village of Palos ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Northwestern University v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Oak Grove Jubilee Center, Inc. v. City of GenoaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.