Bart Zebrowski v. Michael H. Hanna, Salvatore Altomare
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Chief Judge.
The legal issue before us concerns the scope of the district court’s “inherent power” to “fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct which abuses the judicial process.” Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., — U.S. -, -, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2133, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). The four appellants are plaintiffs in a lawsuit against a developer who had sold them, and retained mortgages on, condominiums, and who counterclaimed for second-mortgage payments. The plaintiffs told the district court they were providing the defendant with some financial security, in case they lost, by making their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Atlanta Shipping Corporation, Inc. v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Hmg Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Charbono v. Sumski (In Re Charbono)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Meyer v. ChieffoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pan American Grain Manufacturing Co. v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- In Re Villa Marina Yacht Harbor, Inc., Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Villa Marina Yacht Harbor, Inc., A/K/A Villa Marina Yacht Harbour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.