Legal Opinion

Gay v. Watkins

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-2089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, Chief Judge.

In this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et seq., Wilmer B. Gay seeks damages and an injunction against several defendants for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Gay, an inmate of Pennsylvania’s State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, claims that the defendants have refused to provide him with complete and accurate transcripts of his criminal trial and post conviction hearings, thus depriving him of his First Amendment right of uninhibited access to the courts. The various defendants have filed motions to dismiss the complaint.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harold Raymond Hooks v. R. v. Roberts, Warden, Hillsborough County Convict CampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Harlan G. Smith v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. DarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Gay v. WatkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gay v. WatkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API