Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 15, 1986No. Nos. 156-84, 157-84PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
The prior opinion of the Court on original submission is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted for it.
A jury convicted appellants of securing execution of a document by deception and assessed punishment for each at five years confinement and a fine of $2500. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction. Smith v. State, 681 S.W.2d 71 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1983).
We granted ground for review one in appellants’ petitions for discretionary review to address a procedural issue concerning supplementation of an…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Nethery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Measeles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Deaton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
4Cited by8 opinions
- Tom Bennett and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Larry Wayne GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Calvin Gary Walker v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022
- Howard Thomas Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Howard Thomas Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Howard Thomas Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.