Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1984No. B14-82-392-CR, A14-82-397-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Although indicted separately, appellants were jointly tried for the offenses of securing execution of a document by deception as proscribed by the TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.46 (Vernon 1974). The jury rejected their pleas of not guilty, found each guilty on four counts alleged in their respective indictments and assessed punishment for each at confinement for a period of five years and a fine of $2,500 on each count. The appeals have been consolidated. Appellants raise twelve identical grounds of error concerning sufficiency of evidence, jury argument, charge to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Scott v. Car City Motor Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Tom Bennett and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Larry Wayne GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Sheriff v. CrockettNevada Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API