Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
Although indicted separately, appellants were jointly tried for the offenses of securing execution of a document by deception as proscribed by the TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.46 (Vernon 1974). The jury rejected their pleas of not guilty, found each guilty on four counts alleged in their respective indictments and assessed punishment for each at confinement for a period of five years and a fine of $2,500 on each count. The appeals have been consolidated. Appellants raise twelve identical grounds of error concerning sufficiency of evidence, jury argument, charge to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Scott v. Car City Motor Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Tom Bennett and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Larry Wayne GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Sheriff v. CrockettNevada Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.