Legal Opinion
Techniarts Video, Inc. v. 1631 Kalorama Associates
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1990No. 89-174PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Techniarts Video, Inc. (Techn-iarts), appeals from an order of the Superi- or Court dismissing its amended complaint with prejudice. In the original complaint, Techniarts alleged that appellees, 1631 Ka-lorama Associates (Kalorama), a District of Columbia general partnership, had breached an oral contract to compensate Techn-iarts on an hourly basis for engineering and consulting services provided for the conversion of a warehouse and roller skating rink in Northwest Washington, D.C. to a television and movie production studio. Citing various omissions in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Garces v. BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Frazier v. Center Motors, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- LaPrade v. LehmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pollock v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Shimer v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cameron v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Technical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Wagshal v. RiglerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- District of Columbia v. SerafinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.