Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1994No. 93-CV-444PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a trial court order denying appellant’s motion to reinstate her complaint, which had been dismissed for failure to comply with Super.Ct.Civ.R. 4(j). Appellant contends that the trial court’s refusal to reinstate her complaint was arbitrary and an abuse of discretion and that it was the result of bias. We hold that these claims are without merit and affirm the trial court’s order.
I
On September 8, 1992, appellant filed a negligence complaint in the Superior Court in which she alleged that she sustained inju-ríes when she fell on a malfunctioning…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Taylor v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Tso v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Techniarts Video, Inc. v. 1631 Kalorama AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Pryor v. PryorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gross Ex Rel. Spears v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bulin v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shi Mui Liu v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wagshal v. RiglerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.