Legal Opinion
United States v. Parada
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2009No. 07-3272PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Norman A. Parada, John McNeill, Tiffany Poulin, and Kelly Bradley were charged in federal court with possession of PCP with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess PCP with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Poulin and Bradley entered plea agreements with the government. Mr. Parada and McNeill were tried together and convicted as charged. In a prior consolidated appeal, we affirmed McNeill’s conviction but reversed Mr. Parada’s conviction for an evidentiary error. United States v. McNeill, 136 Fed.Appx. 153, 158 (10th Cir. 2005)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John David StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Keith Rudolph Ludwig, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. KitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.