Legal Opinion
Neidhardt v. D.H. Holmes Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-3139PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:
Once more a panel of this Circuit confronts the continuing saga of EEOC v. D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Neidhardt v. D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd.). In the last installment, which was unpublished, a panel assessed appellate costs and attorneys’ fees against three individual intervenors-appellants because they brought a frivolous appeal of the district court’s decision on the merits. On remand for a determination of these costs, D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd. (“Holmes”) also explicitly requested, for the first time since judgment was entered, attorneys’ fees for previous district court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lopez v. Aransas County Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Fred A. Cruz, and Mrs. Frances T. Freeman Cruz, Movant-Appellant v. W.B. "Bill" Hauck, Sheriff of Bexar County, Texas, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Vukadinovich v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Orshan v. MacChiarolaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.