Legal Opinion

Cansler v. Sallis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1877PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Itawamba County. Hon. Laeayette Hatjghton, Chancellor. T. Gr. Cansler filed this bill against E. D. Sallis, Thomas Mann and L. Hampton, alleging that, in December, 1873, the complainant sold to Sallis a tract of land, the purchase-money for which was paid in part, and for the balance Sallis gave his note. The complainant executed a deed to Sallis, and to secure the unpaid part of the purchase-money Sallis conveyed the land to Cayce, trustee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Itawamba County. Hon. Laeayette Hatjghton, Chancellor. T. Gr. Cansler filed this bill against E. D. Sallis, Thomas Mann and L. Hampton, alleging that, in December, 1873, the complainant sold to Sallis a tract of land, the purchase-money for which was paid in part, and for the balance Sallis gave his note. The complainant executed a deed to Sallis, and to secure the unpaid part of the purchase-money Sallis conveyed the land to Cayce, trustee. Being indebted to Hampton, on May 4, 1874, Sallis conveyed the land to Mann, in trust to secure said indebtedness.…

1Opinion of the CourtChalmers, J.

That a mere change in the form of indebtedness will not discharge a lien, unless it is apparent that the parties intended to extinguish it, is well settled. The principle was stated and fully recognized in Lewis v. Starke, 10 S. & M. 120, 128, and in the recent case of Howell v. Bush, ante, 437; but in those cases the facts negatived any intention of retaining the lien, and demonstrated an opposite intention.

In this case, on the contrary, the allegations of the bill, which are admitted by the demurrer, are that “ when the new note and trust-deed were taken, it was not intended to destroy the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swift v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Flower v. ElwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Dillon v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Union Mortgage, Banking & Trust Co. v. Peters & TrezevantMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Institute Building & Loan Ass'n v. EdwardsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  5. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API