In re de la Rosa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Dan M. de la Rosa was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on January 23, 1995, and at all times relevant herein, he *135has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges which alleged that he falsified an expense report and related invoices arising out of a trip to Las Vegas, Nevada, on a client matter, thereby inflating his expenses by approximately $2,000. Respondent was charged with engaging in conduct involving…
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re VohraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of HorensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015