Legal Opinion

Silberberg v. Trachtenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Rew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

This case comes up on an agreed statement of facts, which are briefly as follows: One Aronowitz, the owner of certain premises, leased them to Mantel. The lease provided that repairs were to be made by Aronowitz. Subsequently this plaintiff acquired title to the prem*537ises and also became entitled to the rent under the lease, and the defendants herein succeeded to Mantel’s rights under the lease. Thereafter these defendants attorned to the plaintiff. After June 1, 1907, repairs became necessary to the premises and the tenants made them to the extent of sixty-one dollars in value. On December 1,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Mayor, C., of New-York v. . MabieNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Kelsey v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Ely v. SpieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. In re CoatsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arroyo v. RosenbluthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  2. Ratcliff v. SharrockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Volga Realty Corp. v. Chauncey Holt Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API